The Brain in a Vat

This is the first blogpost on a philosophical topic of hopefully many to come.

I started taking philosophy in my last year of high school. This class has taught me so much more than I would initially have thought! After (and while) I took that class, I started to realize how much of the books that I have read and the movies that I have watched are based on philosophies that are hundreds of years old.

During the next few weeks I would like to discuss some of the philosophies that we encounter in modern day science fiction.

Back when I was still in school, the Brain in a Vat thought experiment was the topic that impressed me most, so let’s start with that.

The “Brain in a Vat” Thought Experiment

A “thought experiment” sounds rather… clinical, wouldn’t you agree? It makes me think of lab coats and animal testing. A thought experiment has nothing to do with either.

Simply put, a thought experiment is when you consider a theory, or hypothesis. You just think about it, you don’t even need the intention to actually test your hypothesis.

The Brain in a Vat thought experiment focuses on truth, meaning, and particularly reality. The theory is that a brain would be taken from a body and hooked up to a computer, which would stimulate it electronically, making it perceive a world as it normally would in a human body.

Considering the above, we could ask ourselves: how do we know that our brains are in our skulls, and not in some mad scientist’s vats? The Brain in a Vat hypothesis suggests that we wouldn’t even know.

The “Brain in a Vat” experiment is based on many theories, among which René Descartes’ “evil daemon” theory (Meditations on First Philosophy, 1641 – Descartes is most famous for the quote “I think, therefore I am”). Descartes suggests the existence of an evil daemon, that would present an illusion that would make you believe you have a body and that you experience its sensations, while in fact you have no body. The evil daemon would make you believe there’s an external world, while there is no world at all.

The Matrix

It’s unlikely that you haven’t seen the movie The Matrix. The Matrix depicts a future world in which (human-built) sentient machines dominate the human kind. They have put (nearly) all people in incubators (or vats) and they are hooked to the machines. The energy that the human body generates is stored and used by the machines. While in those vats, the people experience a reality that is not real – a simulated reality, created (and controlled) by the machines.

You can see how this is essentially based on the “Brain in a Vat” theory, although in The Matrix, the people are all linked to a world created by the machines. They don’t actually perceive a world that their own brains have produced through electrical impulses.

Simulated reality

The reality the person (or, if we pay attention to semantics, ”the one perceiving”) would be in, could be called a “simulated reality”, as it would be simulated by a computer (or a brain). This is different from the better known virtual reality, because the fake (virtual) reality is easily distinguishable from the real one.

There are a multitude of modern day sci-fi movies and episodes of TV shows that are based on the notion of the “Brain in a Vat” experiment and simulated reality. From the top of my head I can name a couple of episodes of Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis that were based on the theory (some subtly and some not at all subtly).

There is a German movie, called Goodbye, Lenin! (although it’s not really sci-fi), that is set around the fall of the Berlin Curtain. The mother of a family has a near deadly heart-attack and falls into a coma. When she wakes up physically and mentally weakened, the Wall has already fallen. Her two children are afraid that the shock of this news is too great for her to bear, and create a world around her that obscures the news. They even create fake news broadcasts to maintain their illusion.
This is a simulated reality, but I’m not sure if you could say it’s a Brain in a Vat.
I’ve seen this movie many times and I would recommend it to everyone! It’s good to move away from Hollywood at times, and Germany produces great movies (Das Experiment, although totally unrelated, is a good German movie as well).

Another great example is the more recent movie Inception, where the main characters have to be careful not to be pulled into the simulated reality of a person’s dream.

My experience

I have often thought about the “Brain in a Vat” hypothesis. It started when I was following the philosophy course in high school.

In my opinion, the “Brain in a Vat” hypothesis as I outlined it cannot be real. There are too many instances where I think “there is no way I could have made up all this myself”. There is no way that I could have made up Descartes “evil daemon”, or for instance, rugby.  Or the thousands of movies out there.

Perhaps I’m seriously underestimating the capability of my brain, but I simply can’t make myself believe that it’s capable to do that on its own. However, that does make me wonder if our reality (or my reality) isn’t an assembly of realities, created by multiple brains.

Please share your thoughts on this topic, I would love to hear what you think about it!

  • http://www.kristenlamb.org Kristen Lamb

    Wow! I am such a geek and I LOVED this. I find it amazing how science and the arts bleed into each other. They seem like polar opposites, but they realy aren’t. Both rely on creativity at their source.

    Can’t wait for the next blog. Great job :D .

    • Manon Eileen

      Thanks *squees* :D

      I totally agree on them seeming to be polar opposites. I’m being educated to be a scientist and I take a lot of inspiration from it for writing and other artsy stuff that I keep myself busy with!
      I really think that to be a scientist you need some form of creativity, even if it’s in the shape of thinking out of the box.

      The next blog will be posted tuesday!

  • http://cmstewartwrite.wordpress.com/ CMStewart

    Pondering the “brain in a vat” scenario, and the question of “free will,” either makes me depressed or ecstatic. I haven’t decided which yet.

    Great post!

    • Manon Eileen

      Thank you very much :)

      Actually, I just decided tonight that free will was going to be the next theme I want to talk about! So stay tuned, I guess!

      I’m right with you on the depressed/ecstatic part – it’s a very frightening scenario, at the least.

  • http://piperbayard.wordpress.com Piper Bayard

    Hi Manon. What a great blog! Reminds me of when my son was four and asked, “Are we just characters in a movie?” I told him that in my movie, we’re real. I actively try not to think I’m a brain in a vat, but very interesting read. Looking forward to more. All the best.

    • Manon Eileen

      Thank you Piper! :D

      What about The Sims? Ever since I started playing that game (long long time ago now!) .. I was hooked as soon as I got it! I’ve always considered the situation that what if we’re like The Sims? Is there something out there, controlling us?

      Although we’d be much more complex than The Sims, even more complex than the third installment :p

      I too try to avoid thinking about the brain in a vat theory… Actually, when I first started to think about this topic it depressed me very badly! But… I guess since I’ve “done” the thought experiment and have concluded for myself that it’s not real that it doesn’t bother me so much anymore.

  • http://indiegamedesign.blogspot.com Patrick Thunstrom

    Great breakdown of the concept, and another movie, similar to Goodbye, Lenin in how it explores the concept, is 50 First Dates and how the dad and brother keep the female lead thinking it’s still the day she had the accident.

    I generally agree that the brain in a vat concept can’t work as an individual by itself, since there are a number of ideas that I doubt I personally could have come up with without some sort of outside information, in fact most of what we take for granted as accepted ideas today were built up over time by insight after insight among many people. I think what I’m saying is if reality is a brain in a vat, then it’s more like the Matrix, with many minds collaborating to create reality, instead of a single focused one.

    • Manon Eileen

      Hi Patrick, thank you for reading :D

      I haven’t seen 50 First Dates, myself, but it does really sound like a Brain in a Vat kinda thing.

      And I totally agree on the rest… It sure is an interesting thing to think about, isn’t it?

  • A.J. Zaethe

    I have often pondered this myself. I have wondered if this were all an illusion and through my own experiments of conversation have determined there are only a handful of real people in my world, IF this were an actual illusion. Now that I sound insane, let me poke you with this. If all the brain has ever experienced was its own created world, how would it know that the reality it has created is beyond its own ability when no memory exits to compare it too? In other words, what it believes is beyond its own ability may not actually be. It is whatever ever this illusion is that is telling the brain that the reality it perceives is beyond its own imagination and creation in thought. What do you think?

    • Manon Eileen

      Hi A.J. and thank you for reading and your rather complicated comment ^_^ I had to read it a couple of times to understand exactly what you were saying… :p

      You have a really good point, actually, which immediately defeats my reasoning as to why the world around us has to be real. Your theory is definitely possible! I hope it’s not though… I think that I subconsciously (and maybe consciously too) hope that the world around us is not an illusion.

      • A.J. Zaethe

        I myself believe that it is not true. But you never know…and frankly, I don’t want to know! Haha. Sorry for being too complicated, I can do that sometimes and I do try to explain myself as thoroughly as possible. But I am looking forward to your other blogs.

        • Manon Eileen

          Yeah, you’re right, perhaps it’s better we don’t know! ^_^

          Thank you very much!

  • Pingback: Blogging Part 3–Tearing Up the SEO in 2011 « Kristen Lamb's Blog

  • http://www.billhubiak.com Bill Hubiak

    Just found your blog through a posting on Kristen Lamb’s blog. Love it. I’ll be back.

  • http://twitter.com/CMStewartWrite CMStewart

    In case you haven’t seen this yet: http://www.simulation-argument.com/

    • http://www.manoneileen.com Manon Eileen

      Oh wow, that is really interesting. Thanks for sharing, @twitter-42650959:disqus !