The neuroscience of free will, and OCD

Last week, I introduced you to free will. I considered two main positions: determinism and libertarianism. To summarize last week’s post shortly, the determinist does not believe that there is something as free will, and the libertarian believes that humans can take more than one course of action when having to make a choice. (Please note that I have adjusted the part on libertarianism in the previous article).

Today, I will discuss the neuroscience of free will. Also, I will share some information on the Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, which in my opinion has a lot to do with free will.

The introspection illusion

The philosophies of the determinists and libertarians already existed long before neuroimaging was possible. Nowadays, neuroscience has shed light on the question of free will.

The most important (and significant) finding is that a person’s brain has already made decisions before the person actually becomes aware of having made them. You probably think that your brain has made the decision maybe a half or one second before you become aware of it, but a study in 2008 predicted that people make a choice approximately 10 seconds before they become aware of it.

It may be that humans have made a wrong connection between being aware of a choice and what it causes – or more clearly put, we have confused correlation with causation.

Introspection illusions are the notion that people wrongly think they have direct insight into the origin of their mental states. This means that in some situations, people are confident in making false explanations of their own behavior. The illusion of introspection is often mistaken for true self-knowledge.

For instance, people often think they are less biased and less conformist than the rest of a group. Even when people learn about other people’s introspections, they are regarded as unreliable (while they treat their own introspections as reliable).

Bereitschaftspotential

The Bereitschaftpotential (a German term, in English this is called the “readiness potential”) is a measure in the motor cortex of the brain leading up to voluntary movement. It was first recorded by neurologists Kornhuber and Deecke in 1964 at the University of Freiburg in Germany.

In the 1980’s, a physiologist called Benjamin Libet performed a series of experiments to study the relationship between conscious awareness and the readiness potential. He found that the readiness potential started approximately 0.35 seconds earlier before the subject becomes aware of the desire to make a movement. Libet concluded that we have no free will in the initiation of movement, but since we are able to not make a movement after the initiation, we do have a “veto” to stop ourselves from moving.

There is a LOT more to tell about the neuroscience of free will (and decision making), and perhaps I will return to the subject in the future, but for now I think this illustrates the subject sufficiently.

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

Diagnostic Criteria for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (as per the DSM)

A. Either obsessions or compulsions:

Obsessions are as defined by (1), (2), (3), and (4):

  1. recurrent and persistent thoughts, impulses, or images that are experienced, at some time during the disturbance, as intrusive and inappropriate and that cause marked anxiety or distress
  2. the thoughts, impulses, or images are not simply excessive worries about real-life problems
  3. the person attempts to ignore or suppress such thoughts, impulses, or images, or to neutralize them with some other thought or action
  4. the person recognizes that the obsessional thoughts, impulses, or images are a product of his or her own mind (not imposed from without as in thought insertion)

Compulsions as defined by (1) and (2):

  1. repetitive behaviors (e.g., hand washing, ordering, checking) or mental acts (e.g., praying, counting, repeating words silently) that the person feels driven to perform in response to an obsession, or according to rules that must be applied rigidly
  2. the behaviors or mental acts are aimed at preventing or reducing distress or preventing some dreaded event or situation; however, these behaviors or mental acts either are not connected in a realistic way with what they are designed to neutralize or are clearly excessive

The person must have recognized the obsessions or compulsions as excessive or unreasonable (this does not apply to children). The obsessions or compulsions cause distress, are time consuming (take more than an hour a day), or significantly interfere with the person’s normal routine functioning, usual activities or relationships. The obsessions or compulsions should not be part of other disorders such as eating disorders, body dysmorphic disorder (preoccupation with physical appearance, trichotillomania (hair pulling), substance use disorder, hypochondriasis (preoccupation with having a serious illness), paraphilia (preoccupation with sexual urges or fantasies) or major depressive disorder (guilty ruminations).

The symptoms must not be due to the direct physiological effects of a substance or a general medical condition.

In the USA, OCD is the fourth most common psychological disorder – it affects 1 in every 50 people. It is a disease of fears, troubling thoughts that occur over and over. The routines that the OCD sufferer performs are usually ways to alleviate the stress they experience from their fear.

At least half of the adults who get help for OCD already had it as children. Although the cause of OCD is not known, research suggests that it may be due to a lack of serotonin in the brain.

OCD may also run in the family or stress as well as an emotionally traumatic experience could be the cause, but for the majority, OCD can be effectively controlled and treated by either behavioral therapy or chemical therapy.

If we consider that a person with OCD is able to change their behavior through behavioral therapy, this should suggest that the person is able to do this through their own free will. From Libet we learned that we have a “veto” if it comes to stopping our initiated movements, and apparently, this is shown very clearly in the person with OCD. In behavioral therapy, they are taught to first recognize their fears and urges, and then they have to openly confront their fears or learn to resist the urge to perform a ritual. In a study performed by Jeffrey Schwartz, an expert in the field of OCD, 12 out of 18 OCD sufferers responded positively to this kind of therapy. Does this mean that the patients learn to resist their urges through free will, or through the “veto” we all have over our readiness potential?

To conclude this week’s blog: last week, one of the people that commented on “The Concept of Free Will” suggested that free will is an illusion. Neuroscientist Sam Harris suggests the following: “thoughts simply arise (what else could they do?)…The illusion of free will is itself an illusion”.

Please share your thoughts on this interesting topic!

  • http://petersaintclair.wordpress.com/ Peter Saint-Clair

    I don’t normally comment on a lot of your posts because most of the time what you are talking about is way over my head, but I love the Sam Harris quote you used to conclude your post. I’ve never thought of free will in that way.

    Keep up the good work and I’ll try to keep up with you…lol I love learning and I have learned a lot from your posts…thanks for that.

    • Manon Eileen

      Thanks for commenting, Peter, I really appreciate it! ^_^

      Do you think I should make the blogs a little .. easier? I mean, I’m used to writing scientific articles for uni, perhaps I’m falling back to old habits (although I’m really actively trying to not have it sound *that* dry, lol).

      The Sam Harris quote indeed is an interesting one, I found it very fitting of the topic!

      Thanks for the compliments and I’m glad I can teach people something, lol!

      • http://petersaintclair.wordpress.com/ Peter Saint-Clair

        No, no, don’t change the way you are writing them, I’m just saying that the subject matter is at times over my head, and that’s no fault of yours or in the way you present the posts. The problem is with me, as this isn’t an area I’m familiar with, that’s all.

        • Manon Eileen

          Alright, glad to hear, then :p. And I hope you’ll become a little more familiar with the area through my posts, then! :D

  • http://cmstewartwrite.wordpress.com/ CMStewart

    Great information, not at all dry IMO.

    ” . . 12 out of 18 OCD sufferers responded positively to this kind of therapy. Does this mean that the patients learn to resist their urges through free will . . ?” This means that 12 out of 18 OCD sufferers were predetermined to respond positively. Vetoes are predetermined, as are vetoes of vetoes, and so forth.

    “The illusion of free will is itself an illusion.” I would agree in the sense that reality itself is also an illusion, as is comprehension. But sometimes you have to just live your life, regardless of the incomprehensibility of comprehension. And the “just living your life”- that course of action is predetermined too, and is an illusion as well. ;)

    • Manon Eileen

      Thanks again for your comments, CMStewart!

      You again have some very interesting points :p They always make me think! I’m glad you’re always sharing your thoughts!!

  • Pingback: Blogging Part 4–The Future is Now « Kristen Lamb's Blog

  • http://unsanityfiles.com Albert Berg

    I don’t see how this negates the concept of free will in any way. Just because my conscious mind isn’t making the decisions doesn’t mean there aren’t any decisions being made, nor does it mean that they aren’t being made by me. Unless of course we’re not counting the subconscious as part of “me” but that’s a whole other can of worms. Point being, some part of my mind is making decisions based on facts and feelings. What better definition of free will is there?

    • Manon Eileen

      Thank you for reading and commenting, Albert!

      And you have a really valid point and a very interesting way of seeing free will. Haven’t seen anyone voice the same idea so far!

      Perhaps the subconscious would be another interesting topic to discuss in a future post?

      I think it’s tough to decide what is “free will” in general. Is it just an idea, or an illusion that our brain has created for us? Or perhaps it really is a part of our minds that has the ability to make choices – maybe subconsciously, but most likely always with best gain for us in mind.

      • http://unsanityfiles.com Albert Berg

        I believe I would say that if there is an illusion of any kind it would be consciousness itself. Not that consciousness does not exist, but rather it doesn’t do what we think it does. Consciousness is not the place where thinking happens. Instead it is the place where we become aware of the thoughts happening in our brains. In other words, consciousness allows us to be able to observe our own minds. That is why we think we make decisions far later than we actually do. Somehow the delay between the thought and us being aware of the thought is about ten seconds.
        As an analogy it’s very similar to looking at the sun and assuming that what you’re seeing is real, when actually you’re only seeing the light-waves created by the sun nine minutes earlier. You look up and say “I see the sun, therefore it must exist,” when the reality is, you can only be certain it existed nine minutes ago.
        And being aware of that fact doesn’t seem to change much because it’s nearly impossible to differentiate between the representation of the thing and the thing itself on a fundamental level.

        • Manon Eileen

          I have to admit that I agree with you on most of what you have said.

          Especially “consciousness allows us to be able to observe our own minds” hits the nail on the head. I think it’s a really good way of putting it.

          Thank you for your thoughtful comment!

          • http://cmstewartwrite.wordpress.com/ CMStewart

            It’s useful to note that any discussion of “free will,” “consciousness,” decision,” et cetera, is going to be tricky in that the definitions of the key terms aren’t going to be the same from person to person. For example, one person may define “decision” as “causally integrated thought” as while another person may define “decision” simply as “free will.”

  • http://jamigold.com Jami Gold

    This is interesting stuff. The concept of free will is a major theme in many of my stories. It’s funny how the conscious part of our brain is so out-of-sync with the subconscious part, and yet we think we know ourselves.

    • Manon Eileen

      Thanks for reading and commenting, Jami :D

      It certainly is an interesting theme to incorporate in stories – it’s a great philosophy to think about and get people to think about!

  • Pingback: Consciousness and Other Feats of Legerdemain « Unsanity Files

  • http://archivesofheart.blogspot.com puzzled

    I have read your post and I agree with your argument,you have presented good arguments.Wegner says that even veto is originated subconsciously…..but if its science then:
    1) why human actions are impossible to predict to after all if we there is no will power and consequently soul ,every thing happen according to laws of physics
    2) why we still able to change the imminent urges and impulses e.g obsessive compulsive disorder therapy,sexual desires,rage
    3)why is that its completely upon us to let go of things or letting the tension cycle going and build up into uncontrollable emotions
    4)why is that we can suppress some thoughts and divert them to other topics which we choose ourselves.
    5)and why is that going against the impulses requires force and makes us feel exhausted,if veto impulse was subconscious why are we troubled so much.
    6)if its interaction of complex set deterministic rules then why it can’t be said that its we who choose to prefer one rule over other though this process is felt by us as a crude sense of consciousness.

    but i don’t think its science,but just a philosophical exploitation of ideas,even you cannot predict physical effects with accuracy because quantum physics talks of probabilities rather then definite answers opening the door for alternative explanation
    stephen hawking had said before the his change of heart during writing great design:even the people who say that every thing is predetermined, see on both sides while crossing the road